GIMP truly is a standalone program, though, and there are not accompanying or supporting tools to use alongside it. If you use other Adobe products to manage your photo library and perform imaging work, you'll find that Photoshop slots very neatly into your working process. Photoshop and GIMP are both standalone products, but Photoshop benefits from fitting into a Creative Cloud workflow. The fact that you are paying for the software gives you access to a dedicated team of experts at Adobe who can help you out should you get stuck. Where Photoshop does win, however, is support. There's a wider range of tutorials available for Photoshop, and they are generally of a higher standard, but GIMP users aren't left entirely to their own devices. That said, there are a wide range of tutorials online for both image editors, covering just about every tool, scenario and problem you could imagine. 'Ease of use' is a difficult term to apply to the programs because just how simple they are to use really depends on what you're trying to achieve. Ease of use and performanceīoth GIMP and Photoshop take time to get to know, and time to master. That said, there are plenty of alternatives to Photoshop plugins should you find that one of your favourites does not work properly. GIMP supposedly works with Photoshop plugins, but support isn't guaranteed, so you may find that some don’t work at all or are a little unstable. Photoshop is famous for its exhaustive range of plugins, and it would be easy to spend more on extending the capabilities of the program than you do on the program itself – although there are plenty of free plugin available as well. Some people would argue that image editing is all about plugins, and you're somewhat spoiled for choice whether you opt for Photoshop or GIMP. Photoshop is a professional-level photo editor, and has a learning curve to match (Image credit: Adobe) Plugins A key advantage of Photoshop for photographer is its unparalleled non-destructive editing, while designers will appreciate CMYK support.īut while both programs are immensely powerful, their incredible range of features can be further bolstered through the use of plugins. This isn't to say that you won’t be able to get the same results in GIMP, just that you will have to do a little more manual work to do so.īoth image editor support RAW files, which is great news for serious photographers, but you may find that GIMP is a little less reliable in this department. While GIMP has a healing brush tool, Photoshop has no fewer than three healing tools. However, the free program simply does not manage to life up to the capabilities of Photoshop. Photoshop has just about every tool imaginable, and GIMP does a very good job of trying to replicate its selection. The chances are that – unless you're a designer or a very serious hobbiest – you simply won't use half of what's on offer in each of them. Neither Photoshop nor GIMP skimp on features. In fact, this can be half of the battle with using Photoshop or GIMP – knowing where to find the tools you are trying to use! As you become more familiar with the layout of the options, you'll find that your workflow improves and you'll also have more time to experiment rather than just sticking with the tools and options you know already. Like Inkscape, it’s not directly related to UI, but might be handy.With both programs, you will need to spend time not only learning what all of the tool do, but where you can find them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |